Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on blocking entries. (#3131)

Bence Béky <> Mon, 28 October 2019 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50BA12004E for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3HcK3cjLTfpS for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF86120096 for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:19:53 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572293993; bh=WjSv6Ikk5VpWRk5pxk5WB6XDv8sAIyZTzMI6FIlC5JY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=JcLtPaCDDxHsIHTir0rqeotsoRgcA7V/tITNs44kuz75q3VM1z2rk65WPN0OC4pao NPaUoXgDJlvgfoqGH/8rEKFccdLTi9F0X6YG3IrX0zHLs8bO0PMnOrNXQiG27oGSyC RLfCXXLrzp6VNjLD7lGvY4uom++wTcVkStnPyjD8=
From: Bence Béky <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on blocking entries. (#3131)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db74d696541d_6c453fca8c2cd9681623a9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: bencebeky
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:19:57 -0000

> I would not tie the definition of what it means for an entry to be acknowledged to an implementation. Keeping a count of entries that have been inserted via the `Known Received Count` is just one way to do it.

Both endpoints must keep track of Known Received Count anyway, so this does not feel too implementation-specific to me.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: