Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] pto_count should be reset when dropping a packet number space (#3272)

ianswett <> Sat, 23 November 2019 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9178012004F for <>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:11:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xgxE2m_3Gdkz for <>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:11:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F32DA120024 for <>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:11:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040681C1C78 for <>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:11:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1574536280; bh=3KmUGFJxJbYtnMGF/lIH+8YUN+JfKjJpBWSgVL4msNc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SBT5hxmYW9JAHs/sojD+Fa8DpKFShPQEE7YXumhBjxvUQetKP5fieTt8IwaV0udR5 er9v29NBHYznVlQhm9d+3LoUE8wRCTWUJEEPhVqMRcVcubMYuKo6/Ah/w6xKLyFEku AWu0UYtNRyK/hHQDK6Ez4IqZM9WJ+XUW1EeOnFIY=
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:11:19 -0800
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3272/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] pto_count should be reset when dropping a packet number space (#3272)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd98457e9fc6_b323fa01a4cd96c75452a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 19:11:23 -0000

I also tend to think this is Ok.  Importantly, if you don't get any ACKs, you also have no RTT samples, and in that case, continuing to backoff the PTO is very possibly the right thing to do.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: