Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Conflicting error codes (#4087)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 15 September 2020 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CA83A0EA6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.695, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AzIm8TCdb89Q for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BB363A0EA5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-bb778fb.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-bb778fb.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.102.56]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302345C0571 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1600135100; bh=FtwsXB185sDsxh/2RrOvmAmIMj4mS91AvWOH4tyR3ZY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=LmrGmzWP77blnFYsJoQu+3u/WrD0+Q/umxYsMCeVXxLevtBSVBm+fCNrKpBt7/Wlu oV9qBocCBpZJ7ssGC1RasGNUGW65kVVaz7rA6K0iRLmbfp70lFXNGY1ro+RWeHqGdG v+12RQHy7aXCQlttCGrbXHoM168WK9dg00R5u7D0=
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:58:20 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK25G4D52V3I2XVJZIF5NQALZEVBNHHCTETOJE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4087/692414330@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4087@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4087@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Conflicting error codes (#4087)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f601fbc20470_153619f066715e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/nUmAavrL-iU9z4t8NxTCWfFC2Qs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:58:22 -0000

@marten-seemann, it would be non-trivial for neqo to implement that MAY.  The information about what keys are used is quite well separated from the code that manages acknowledgments.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4087#issuecomment-692414330