Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sending probe packet has duplicated text (#3468)

mirjak <> Wed, 19 February 2020 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F92412010E for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:00:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z-dkwLd0XgUO for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:00:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1BBE1200B5 for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:00:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A3B960507 for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:00:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1582106408; bh=VhwbrD6MluypHg98i8PfUw7UK2p7aGXhhTYLX9swJ2A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=NC7gi980lYEya63hkUGPEbLXyhIJLJ36waeH522sLWI22RCJAUCeuO+UDwEGlAxF7 jZaPzD2V7eT6N2Iy3zl5pr9ojOXx3s82Djc3EMLsYyNcxg65PLrsSISKtNQ/IIKxxN aIPJ2uyyGLtas1qRusIGc/jvLj2+7o3w01CEUK5g=
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:00:08 -0800
From: mirjak <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3468/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sending probe packet has duplicated text (#3468)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e4d0728c672c_78783f92288cd96845553"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:00:12 -0000

@ianswett I assume you actually meant to put this comment on issue #3464 ?

However, let me answer anyway: draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis as the name says is a bis document, so it does have the title and scope from rfc2140. I agree that this is not TCP specific, however, then it would not be a bis doc anymore but a new document. That is probably something that could be discussed in tcpm. Feel free to raise that point there!

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: