Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use host less, define address more (#3249)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 03:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB2312080E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:26:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-lHWw3hW9LP for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51BF5120800 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.102]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4BE66009E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:26:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1574133987; bh=eVYzoQLq8SZg+8ei5oKeUtXKqnjQ6GoH3ZCU1cP9HuY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=n1ttRc+1vhxa2kEr6qDA7CMfM/3iKb5pfz5UDyZN+00JS+ImZFHXNyjGks22kXbrh v/H7jJkFfG/5XjWeVpTIfZ1rka1wVD43IRVPfhT3tgMS+A1VmyQttte7qwnCf0iCi3 6H6s7afJftL+3JdKz+2PrLw9WlFgkVNicqW2B1HE=
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:26:27 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6ZWGK5VRBRP5Y46GN34CJWHEVBNHHB6OVJPA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3249/review/318765335@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3249@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3249@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use host less, define address more (#3249)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd360e34d9cb_506b3f9cab0cd9601054f3"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/njtRPJnClH5WlrzXyDQztld-cKg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 03:26:29 -0000

martinthomson commented on this pull request.



> @@ -210,6 +210,11 @@ Server:
 
 : The endpoint accepting incoming QUIC connections.
 
+Address:
+
+: When used without qualification, the tuple of IP version, IP address, UDP
+  protocol, and UDP port number that represents one end of a network path.

I was talking about the protocol field in the IP header.  How would you suggest we make that clear?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3249#discussion_r347716257