IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] GREASE the flags byte (#311)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 15 February 2017 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25981294B9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:59:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.269
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.269 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VnRXHl_b4Zlh for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:59:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94FE1129551 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:59:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=lJDNZCcyNlZdsRI0Ncp6RrgYkKY=; b=hKJPRsJgEpSk7EMt PU4vBoI1ubUAhBMMf9PZl2Sluk7AIEfEESt0Wp9mK14hIJrNoEcK9eh1w5Zfh+DI wwmIKyq0guUF9LP73qqGM6FT5BiQINLPOaHZlF6B1+i4hLEBjRCxVvy0B/Wx2w9C xTbq46NbTg3nQ8ZDGcwkqJf1Z8Q=
Received: by filter0990p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0990p1mdw1-17615-58A47AD3-12 2017-02-15 15:59:15.238221219 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id Fz5zk5uDSiueHQ97sk8Vqw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:59:15.158 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:59:15 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/311/280051235@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/311@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/311@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] GREASE the flags byte (#311)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58a47ad312ec3_321d3f83f093313c6097c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1Mv4vOWf5/1ybyAJa7APbEoliT4jKb6vK0D3 l18hyLoM8MM0rqATWoASL3yPQlErK/nfPPxFrHizQC4PoB2QyH0M5lhh9PCXV3Er1NNzuQzvolQWW6 tkqliuVp+hqUUNbEw16sK4H832S4p/yzsrYs3vNXljPtrlwt0MVCeuEdcm1dDb40kwNK9t+jOGoDNw E=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/nlgrUKNTCgk8JyFuYGL8cxApChU>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:59:19 -0000

Consecutive numbers would be easier, but it does present deployment challenges for Google and anyone else who has Google-QUIC deployed, as we transition from one flags approach to another.  This might be solvable other ways, but it'd take some serious thought.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/311#issuecomment-280051235

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status