Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] avoid setting the loss timer when amplification limited (#3596)

ianswett <> Thu, 23 April 2020 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2147A3A0997 for <>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ZmSKbZ_9A58 for <>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C073A0996 for <>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FC8C609F6 for <>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1587653512; bh=u6sbSogz6ccKrf9PbNeDbA/FrM9zNBlvMbaWsB1EJt8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xb5uYHJ8I7iNdxd0Mr/FZDeeHP5XF/RDGMI+vMnjuIMI5aOFi6mgr3QQm0IH79wSk uELj8bbkftqc6x9qnYbJf76CegrpredoqtEFXSpd2MVtc5LEqYVsY0bqdBGE5ncRxB ZTZ5S/gCC2X2zAgUaJNj06RJw8MYjunAGzuNthwo=
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:51:52 -0700
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3596/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] avoid setting the loss timer when amplification limited (#3596)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ea1ab88515bd_66f13fea544cd960810559"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:52:00 -0000

@ianswett approved this pull request.

I think this is slightly better, but I also don't think it matters that much?  If the packets were declared lost, they wouldn't be sent immediately due to the amplification limit, so I think either way works.

I'll let @janaiyengar make the call on whether to merge this.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: