IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAX_PUSH_ID: lower-than-previous value conn error seems too severe (#2412)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 05 February 2019 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F001F130DE7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 03:16:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUdibaTVLiVT for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 03:16:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41D6C12958B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 03:16:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 03:16:52 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1549365412; bh=VIXcl5FEP3VeXuCBeWJWSqSCabhbwDp1x3IIxrJzH08=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=XQb/kO+8G1RXG76C7e2/zZdiNfoS7ph4hloVYszXF98wfeXhn9heESajAYZPo1HC4 r4aLBBShPROTYh5K6s6DIIUreVx5bs4bc3H0uBQTDz2zXOv5UCSjHFrzyHu65B2kIV vqDxLZb/jUCld8JuaxuQ892ylMphlzWYeLZYD9uA=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab78bdf599f8000379aee94b455eb59fea37151e7292cf00000001187132a492a169ce183b427c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2412/460600967@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2412@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2412@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAX_PUSH_ID: lower-than-previous value conn error seems too severe (#2412)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c5970a439783_50903ff4bd0d45c062929"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/nqWxVxv4aNCWCdzbrQm-GXfjSuk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:16:55 -0000

Oh, principles.  The principle at play is that if a peer is demonstrably not participating in the same protocol, stop communicating with them as soon as you detect that so they can sort things out.  There are cases where meaningless messages can be ignored as harmless, but it's best not to ignore them unless ignoring is difficult.  I still think we made the wrong choice with MAX_DATA and friends, but at least there the extenuating circumstances are such that the choice is defensible.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2412#issuecomment-460600967

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email