Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Integrate QUIC DPLPMTUD text (#3695)

Magnus Westerlund <> Tue, 26 May 2020 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4301F3A0D72 for <>; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.482
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2xNcYjdxLHtH for <>; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F4D3A088F for <>; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5141B8C0070 for <>; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1590485560; bh=sUIjCiEweqUMbklbnBUrh2kQbLpnGWiae6P7QnZJado=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=L9JCDcnFeEvkpb+LYzTXeyLDWs7Zbv0ytTOuX2Q68TPtQ26WOcwI8TFHs2qPE5jxH pSyLcTJWCF0fc9jB4TbuX2wj7Uc8gtumaC11iyXGiwAyKeodUjARwB32XpFDfItyFT L9lYWffZ3wRSweD7efPLukBxAGm5fcr0rAklcifc=
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 02:32:40 -0700
From: Magnus Westerlund <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3695/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Integrate QUIC DPLPMTUD text (#3695)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ecce23841cd0_48183fd6fe8cd95c3298ca"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gloinul
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 09:32:44 -0000

So from an AD perspective, draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud is currently blocking another document ( from being published that has a missref on it. Except for this question of QUIC I am ready to approve draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud. 

To me it is also clear that integration of DPLPMTUD done in the QUIC WG will result in less editorial clarity issues that potentially could make an future implementer uncertain. As can already been seen in the PR there a few question that potentially can improve the operation and not unnecessary restrict the operation of DPLPMTUD. 

>From my perspective it looks like the core is a set of minor editorial issues to resolve that will make the DPLPMTUD be clearer and resolve the missref issue and function as well as keeping it in the TSVWG document would. If a little bit more effort is invested after the first step then there is potential for additional improvements. 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: