Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Integrate QUIC DPLPMTUD text (#3695)

[Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>]

So from an AD perspective, draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud is currently blocking another document (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile/) from being published that has a missref on it. Except for this question of QUIC I am ready to approve draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud. 

To me it is also clear that integration of DPLPMTUD done in the QUIC WG will result in less editorial clarity issues that potentially could make an future implementer uncertain. As can already been seen in the PR there a few question that potentially can improve the operation and not unnecessary restrict the operation of DPLPMTUD. 

>From my perspective it looks like the core is a set of minor editorial issues to resolve that will make the DPLPMTUD be clearer and resolve the missref issue and function as well as keeping it in the TSVWG document would. If a little bit more effort is invested after the first step then there is potential for additional improvements. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3695#issuecomment-633917393