[quicwg/base-drafts] Make EOED transmission optional in QUIC, please (#1518)

Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Wed, 04 July 2018 03:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CD6130DDA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 20:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CsBA1t2mGRRJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 20:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB238130DD1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 20:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 20:16:38 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1530674198; bh=3eU/RlLW++dIcVurw3uXiugACtLRQhDO+9nbV6Gl62A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yYlzDdG1eXAxxViiLJq893Nt+4sFlC3KO0gHsgLg6miGAzlGD69ccO48y/NTXE+If CiWWCFeQmUyKEp8he++4h9o3B6v2Z3AA2BBzKoh6vmwllE2Lk3ofm/m75C2+U+JE0t 3AAFJWBLSkGzpJY7sjh+ReTyBE4ZRRZWAKBsBu5Q=
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab152360b51bd07c202e3403ba50c22f13e7fe8c1492cf000000011753fe1692a169ce1427404b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make EOED transmission optional in QUIC, please (#1518)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b3c3c16ab5ae_6a363ff899a64f88536451"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/oB153jaofVXl1O8QFd_Tlb5ciiA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 03:16:42 -0000

The TLS spec seems to imply that the End Of Early Data (EOED) message, if required, should be protected and transmitted as 0-RTT data.  I found that when implementing the draft-13 spec, and it was somewhat of a surprise. I understand the willingness to exactly parallel TLS 1.3 behavior of TCP, but it is weird when packets are sent as UDP datagrams.

The weirdest part is probably the retransmission behavior. 0-RTT packets are only acked by 1-RTT packets. Stream frames in 0-RTT packets are resent in 1-RTT packets. For correct behavior, we must guarantee that it is received before the Client Finished message. What are implementers supposed to do? Put a huge wart in the retransmission control?

It would be much simpler to not require an EOED message for Quic. EOED is not really functional, since 0-RTT packets are not processed through the TLS stack. 0-RTT and 1-RTT packets are in the same sequence space, there is no need for a demarcation. It is just one of those hazing things that are imposed on developers.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518