Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Move/duplicate no server migration text (#4063)

Mike Bishop <> Wed, 02 September 2020 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB623A0CF8 for <>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w00AWPfJdrZQ for <>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C35853A0CE9 for <>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1439F5E005C for <>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1599074463; bh=FmdPSjY04ZOBdXAGUE3TaKt51/xq41HIb7YUIp+8Lc8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=NVuS+GQnzJeiW+hFCAWtGpcaLehBSDHFNmuz4RKDh/QJ7WcCizBbAboB2Foyl19xe 2dV3wpHVZNGXseTwt2p+G0twS10FFjN+fPaTBeW7JhdU7Dcx1YphqjCBYfks+Uxy8V ybCktGyKalrZKHHvZr4CdIqNHK5E5FwDR3GRAxj8=
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:21:03 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4063/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Move/duplicate no server migration text (#4063)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f4ff09f4b7a_5b0e19f02948c1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 19:21:07 -0000

The intent was to keep the path validation mechanisms generic so that an extension could potentially introduce server migration later.  It's stated in 9.6 and the top of 9; before and after the generic part seems sufficient to me.  That said, I think the server migration extension would still require that the client be the one to actually make the change.  Only clients should ever spontaneously send from a new address.  (P2P scenarios notwithstanding....)

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: