[quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156)
ekr <notifications@github.com> Thu, 13 December 2018 20:56 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F25F130E9A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:56:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.842
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.842 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D83VSYVWuSq9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9428130E95 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:56:35 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544734595; bh=5nqpZZhnV/yEyJn+CXWjqQKcjueX/Wxi81iUrST5eiU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=OokHjlr2oIvp1EPSkPd+ZY2qF/sKAt+8S7uQJGTE5oiV9f02ogS4Z0lUJ6pOanxS7 cx/HqNmfA4EQEEirxWZhS7iunO+A/yRQOz0TzD/4Hw4Je+i1Ao9D1l8cXAmUTkUf/z UlcDMiodtm1pjIvOWraPDC+1ZtnoSCMLlObq/hyU=
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab4c23fab8aadcda478801e803778e7b14363fb52692cf00000001182a898392a169ce174bff2c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c12c783bbe9c_604b3fd050cd45b427121a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ofjOhXU5uQAsDnHPGghS-P3rpVQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:56:39 -0000
The current text in S 13.3.2 and other places implies that if my endpoint can access ECN information, it is required to do so and use ACK ECN. This doesn't match my memory of the consensus, which was that ECN support was strictly optional. If people think there was consensus to the contrary, I'd appreciate a pointer. Otherwise this should be changed. I can supply a PR on request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156
- [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156) Martin Thomson