Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecryptable packets (#2028)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 09 January 2019 14:19 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A1612426E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 06:19:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.927
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.927 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=0.726, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E14J2Mg2gH_I for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 06:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE8B1228B7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 06:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 06:19:06 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1547043547; bh=A41r/2ernW+A7oFdQuiQepX7BpoOX6GLonZFa3GEyh4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZnC7qHbT0j8NzoAThZDDiBa1wMGSIgEY4/W0lLI2nuIFTVWfYluI1H6JmB0fcWdqZ gOEtJBa9bXQyOVLpuYO13zrnR+Z0G/gc+sxJNvHxzFOKxPlVywMQRWQ0/ybYbW6goW ud4wyd6k8Ty4mAm4K9PIz6izdyUWedm87rAb2Ats=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab36328b29a4a40112450e142e5ff06d9034a193f592cf00000001184dc4da92a169ce16d1c244@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2028/review/190746408@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2028@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2028@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecryptable packets (#2028)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c3602daf1de1_5ab83fe0572d45c053155c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/p1sM-1JT8-BXLbn-i4yRtcn4PPA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 14:19:09 -0000
ianswett commented on this pull request. > @@ -1000,6 +999,17 @@ The recovery period limits congestion window reduction to once per round trip. During recovery, the congestion window remains unchanged irrespective of new losses or increases in the ECN-CE counter. +## Loss of protected packets during the handshake + +0RTT and 1RTT packets sent prior to handshake completion can arrive before +the peer has keys to unprotect them. In those cases, the peer may decide +not to buffer the packets. This will cause the packets to never be +acknowledged and eventually declared lost, despite being delivered to +the peer. If the server rejects 0RTT, then the congestion controller Done in the other PR. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2028#discussion_r246397227
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecryptable… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… Rui Paulo
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecrypt… ianswett