IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nonsensical MUST on frames fitting in packets (#2603)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Wed, 10 April 2019 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8044F12031A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QOcH_GVZiYSi for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o10.sgmail.github.com (o10.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB78120047 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=ZoqZnsyOd1lH5eIFNYS4mPi6HmQ=; b=bm4iwV+/A7JJEIEn VNQg9MV6AWhM+eCqGDcCD5X8ZiELk3t2tDSeaqmJWTccckzag3mdEr0kVnA7Ac24 JZTbSnbEu8WUS4fOccT3L4LoS1Han7TdWUswHazB0HIj8f+uXnhvUZuYRSobA2us eFO6TaUCICEKhEt3Hbko1Okzlvk=
Received: by filter1823p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1823p1mdw1-23905-5CAE53A6-7 2019-04-10 20:35:50.117754046 +0000 UTC m=+159670.470662642
Received: from github-lowworker-dc5ea3e.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.45]) by ismtpd0016p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 9M8K8NB4REKQLcVTeceYaw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:35:50.135 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-dc5ea3e.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04648260A48 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:35:50 +0000
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab9dee60864498f72716e304c12f030586034bf3bd92cebabb862592a169ce19b4b084@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2603/c481851793@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2603@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2603@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nonsensical MUST on frames fitting in packets (#2603)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cae53a611d0_3d0b3f8de0cd45bc53043a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1x+jyaCLMnKYaUcDctsAYXUwEw4NrpT04CEj WUTipQjokq8N/VgcDaLRjyKo/tw/9Vp/8gCQbsNEpXebcE4kcwWI+VXYq6Ucd72pFegpH5tMI/16xp smTi1bnfX6wHFenqGqwlS8GHBkXHfKFQqKx83d6rx/bytaQ+ttWIO/FCRSiK4eX79wdWj1Kng5jYVL I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/p47pqXH63IjYWel-FDgq1V4qeL4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:36:22 -0000

@LPardue: We require the receiver to close the connection when it doesn't understand how to handle a frame that is split across packets, why not require the sender to not do this thing that will cause the receiver to close the connection.

I could be in the rough here, but I don't understand why we need to drop this requirement. I can live with either text, but I'd prefer the requirement.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2603#issuecomment-481851793

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email