Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nonsensical MUST on frames fitting in packets (#2603)

Jana Iyengar <> Wed, 10 April 2019 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8044F12031A for <>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QOcH_GVZiYSi for <>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB78120047 for <>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=ZoqZnsyOd1lH5eIFNYS4mPi6HmQ=; b=bm4iwV+/A7JJEIEn VNQg9MV6AWhM+eCqGDcCD5X8ZiELk3t2tDSeaqmJWTccckzag3mdEr0kVnA7Ac24 JZTbSnbEu8WUS4fOccT3L4LoS1Han7TdWUswHazB0HIj8f+uXnhvUZuYRSobA2us eFO6TaUCICEKhEt3Hbko1Okzlvk=
Received: by with SMTP id filter1823p1mdw1-23905-5CAE53A6-7 2019-04-10 20:35:50.117754046 +0000 UTC m=+159670.470662642
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id 9M8K8NB4REKQLcVTeceYaw for <>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:35:50.135 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04648260A48 for <>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:35:50 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2603/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nonsensical MUST on frames fitting in packets (#2603)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cae53a611d0_3d0b3f8de0cd45bc53043a"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1x+jyaCLMnKYaUcDctsAYXUwEw4NrpT04CEj WUTipQjokq8N/VgcDaLRjyKo/tw/9Vp/8gCQbsNEpXebcE4kcwWI+VXYq6Ucd72pFegpH5tMI/16xp smTi1bnfX6wHFenqGqwlS8GHBkXHfKFQqKx83d6rx/bytaQ+ttWIO/FCRSiK4eX79wdWj1Kng5jYVL I=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:36:22 -0000

@LPardue: We require the receiver to close the connection when it doesn't understand how to handle a frame that is split across packets, why not require the sender to not do this thing that will cause the receiver to close the connection.

I could be in the rough here, but I don't understand why we need to drop this requirement. I can live with either text, but I'd prefer the requirement.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: