Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Question on ECN validation (#3733)

Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Fri, 05 June 2020 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F037B3A085A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRZP3Orhvwt3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-21.smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 889CD3A0893 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.22.68]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21B9A1E97 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1591362850; bh=BBuW4KcmQOS7bsxdybyBRgr8lgLjTj8YJj2x2C33Y9w=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=UkTDVGuPFCsNdTRvwl6lnEsAdNTr/9dnyuBgz+IPjtO+gEm2Pev36QiD0+gaw3D3e 4ZGDoWVw6knlygRF4dTvyawG22pjxvUMQFNv42jGYk1DnRj/o0Fef6udcK1S3e6xge KLnm7WF/O56SwaMkHBL3W1XPbU4We3/NZi1wCNcc=
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 06:14:10 -0700
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKY3TKZLPOAMKAXF3XF44YTCFEVBNHHCLJE5JM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733/639472177@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Question on ECN validation (#3733)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eda4522b3338_511d3fbcee4cd96c110547"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/pL0BZ_Qk1p74ysnxAjcADRKDko0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:14:13 -0000

It does, thanks. it would probably be useful to introduce those local reference counts before the bullet list, describe how that are maintained, and then use them when describing how to validate.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733#issuecomment-639472177