Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Awkward text in "Sending Probe Packets" (#2493)

ianswett <> Mon, 15 April 2019 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9A21203D6 for <>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.597
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kgGBcuAZqQrL for <>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 807691203BF for <>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Cpk+3PEpN9posrBPAUcHRDLLKzU=; b=Xvm6jtvPzrBkOw1M 3pkGl4Y/MhmyvfV+SFY9v6y2YzHiaPRw5rFnP+WX4gTZcY4yPywL/ZwJe85ytPUT fMALtPZT+2IaodDHeVPtnurHc+uDcvQzgaNzc1N47cYevBiIDi5kdZNl7n6B1Oow 3/341pZSbr1mfLB+w2C3oG19zrs=
Received: by with SMTP id filter1457p1mdw1-31519-5CB4AB75-A 2019-04-15 16:04:05.099499765 +0000 UTC m=+345627.613530020
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id mtLQcunkQJq2TNuoqFQRXQ for <>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:04:05.036 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07969C203C1 for <>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:04:05 +0000
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2493/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Awkward text in "Sending Probe Packets" (#2493)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb4ab755be9_9f23fd56aed45c018692d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2Yo95cjcJzJYXP0eyvjNVVeGrURXJzdJkW2o wKQ2NY538qSRqtUhG1uTDwTDJVjuGdIDI4TcQm9y00FLM1MUVe0N2EO5OTDObLGQlGrf4RoIstcPWE F6fo+1tXwfCT4YQL09vX3jR0OgeM1MYoN4Mt7aCBkNZQvKi8116pWScb46eoQYKLpkDmXGuZZw1DpG E=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:04:08 -0000

The pseudocode now uses SendOneOrTwoPackets(), but the last paragraph pretty clearly violates the previous MUST, which is very bad.

The simplest fix would be to change the MUST to a "SHOULD unless otherwise specified", but I'm increasingly thinking we should stick with the MUST and if you get into a situation you have nothing to send, require sending something ack-eliciting to ensure in-flight packets are removed from flight.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: