Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNECTION_CLOSE frames permitted during the handshake? (#3713)
Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 02 June 2020 23:06 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D18D3A10DD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ohJeP5j05vHJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690EC3A10DC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-2300405.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-2300405.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.39]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973B2A00B2 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1591139180; bh=F/lKZZ14Tx2fCDnWcVXRmaOsNKvwDnFBoLPMNs+zX3A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Qe0ry5gkTrL9I3VN3hn1zPNDOiVMfyfGUXi5G5uEh2ZduMajPAvm82YSBpiwLs8Pj EvJBgkuvibL3twX9vg/7qZlxX2Q44yrnds30kdV2aQz39AW/tHtaTiUbQFwSBF/RW6 g4htRBn5jRPm0uXUTJeMbSdwMOSYZY9U8p+BKTi0=
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:06:20 -0700
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2RNJX6TRBCSQIJACF44K6GZEVBNHHCLBTH5M@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3713/637852947@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3713@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3713@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNECTION_CLOSE frames permitted during the handshake? (#3713)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ed6db6c8710e_b263fc9ed0cd964237f6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/pTDRmsbqwM9L3HYNKqpx1J7Fx7I>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 23:06:22 -0000
@rpaulo: In this case, the intent is to allow both. Unless explicitly specified, I would read the text to mean both types of CONNECTION_CLOSE frames. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3713#issuecomment-637852947
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNECTION… Rui Paulo
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNEC… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNEC… Rui Paulo
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNEC… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNEC… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNEC… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNEC… Rui Paulo
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNEC… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are both types of CONNEC… Martin Thomson