Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Output of the discard keys design team (#2673)

David Schinazi <notifications@github.com> Wed, 08 May 2019 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A72E120073 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4PGHM8A8-gfo for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-19.smtp.github.com (out-19.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DED012006E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 17:10:02 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1557274202; bh=My6azdWnWwPFD0En38SHPVLahYkhQj1nSZIYGWXmHDw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=J5AZdKhHt+s7nI73RCVCY2a5wyxczmBVt4BDRhdLYVZbeuc906HMmVatbgfe/sNBi 9FSlU6MQre4JYrK57ykDn8KwF82MxlB2P5GExVUK+KAXT8rI7APU4+Te9H/M6ubWZP aUJkzc19DZ867nmIlhKeb4yfO9hBJe5xe9Oa4GSA=
From: David Schinazi <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5NMHKNHOCWS4SF6UF235INVEVBNHHBUUAEMU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2673/review/234816126@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2673@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2673@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Output of the discard keys design team (#2673)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd21e5a26228_36983fe9bb2cd96080079"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/pTqgfoxznUT4eqQVMsL4vTl2x-c>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 00:10:05 -0000

DavidSchinazi commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1116,9 +1147,20 @@ TLS KeyUpdate message.  Endpoints MUST treat the receipt of a TLS KeyUpdate
 message as a connection error of type 0x10a, equivalent to a fatal TLS alert of
 unexpected_message (see {{tls-errors}}).
 
-An endpoint MUST NOT initiate more than one key update at a time.  A new key
-cannot be used until the endpoint has received and successfully decrypted a
-packet with a matching KEY_PHASE.
+An endpoint MUST NOT initiate the first key update until the handshake is
+confirmed ({{handshake-confirmed}}). An endpoint MUST NOT initiate a subsequent
+key update until it has received an ACK for a packet sent at the previous
+KEY_PHASE.  This can be implemented by tracking the lowest packet number sent
+with the previous KEY_PHASE, and the highest value of the Largest Acknowledged
+field in any received 1-RTT ACK frame: once the latter is higher than the
+former, another key update can be initiated.
+
+Endpoints only need to maintain the two latest sets of packet protection keys

I'm not sure this is correct. An endpoint can maintain more than 2 sets of keys if it so chooses.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2673#discussion_r281873881