Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)
Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 01:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C419912003F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.281
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sW7EVmCh528R for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C37E120013 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-56fcc46.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-56fcc46.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.102.32]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365BB9610BC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:54:39 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5ICZAZS4JKXRDJQ6V3Q3L57EVBNHHB2WTA7U@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020/530631920@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d79a55f27242_15af3fec860cd96c3032c1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/pU8GpfDqIjpNpZMSKccj3yfDdZ4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 01:54:42 -0000
Thank you for the clarification. We _do_ use the TLS stack to encode / decode the transport parameters, therefore we do want see the TLS grammar-based design being preserved. The reason we do not mind the extension type being a varint is because our codec is flexible enough to handle that. https://github.com/h2o/quicly/blob/master/lib/quicly.c#L1353-L1437 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020#issuecomment-530631920
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Alexis La Goutte
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter regi… Martin Thomson