Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove ack_delay_exponent TP (#2670)

Martin Thomson <> Wed, 10 July 2019 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C341200E7 for <>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HxCVOEKu6ah6 for <>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F2412011D for <>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:40:34 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1562758834; bh=rCFat8LZen9Gx8Oc3OdFIUWuWlkTVX5ySahkRD7L0ZA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xuL22mjL6BsIFT0f6/V40c32JzL7PDjq0PdlQ0usBm6gHI/qUIjb+OQE2nDi7g5ha DGnHe/qeMd1FM5DsCjzhIjoBZMCNFJ1YaJCN6fZwXZ3p9/lrsP8olhjo1zBljX4r0p RMKOGCukKCsEW6Uyioo+orsEMTlcGcGaQS1yrHik=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2670/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove ack_delay_exponent TP (#2670)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d25ceb2af085_73d93ff0026cd964171881f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:40:39 -0000

I'm fairly confident that these operations will be done on relatively small values, and so optimization to that degree will be possible.  I plan to use Rust u128 values and to ignore the cost, but I realize that not every implementation can afford to spend upwards of 4 CPU cycles on an operation that you perform once every other packet.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: