IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some suggestions for RFC 4821 probe packets. (#849)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 08 November 2017 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAF712E037 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:32:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZnBjKCIZyKSi for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:32:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89F78129468 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:32:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=g3Pc11XJQ6sdU26M94pjh2kJPqg=; b=qkWN5wK4HcNPp3b3 O4sgOTwjzshoFf029NUekEkZZTmvIuKT2xMm0fjp+TcWT4gjku+pPA5wDnE1A/Sv MouJRNCieSJLL38tznKzSOOqXrgA32pxWqGRfa07Tm86EhNGqOTgTZ+E9pdlJNJb jFcAJ3ixqmbEmLkH9+NaEPt4tWI=
Received: by filter0113p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0113p1iad2-6758-5A026CD6-F 2017-11-08 02:32:54.525606866 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0003p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id WzIw-zM0Q8-gewH0UlyrkQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:32:54.562 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:32:54 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab9299b6d461ad42676863c6214f4236913807d43c92cf00000001161a2ed692a169ce0fbde07f@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/849/c342690911@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/849@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/849@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some suggestions for RFC 4821 probe packets. (#849)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a026cd66da84_1cd0f3f9094a7cf385077e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
tracking:
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2xZR4Hegq9ZexhS0VZgOEdvZQCOo8l0ugzs9 gc+nDGUbeEFfjIjfdH6eqskKJmbkvIpzQjsKKMQElnO+s2kv5oUehQWQ0NWanLNz8Xrva+UHjrVpI9 6cRY8T1S5hoObDsyto1uA31AGHdv5BW59vHAr07ZsZRQCJ1cSHHneI7rkEFoy/IhqH5OZGCxT/8dcE M=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/pgkGW_oedzZgcdN9h9dBVrBXfSg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:32:57 -0000

@martinthomson The current text intends to say ALL frames generate acknowledgements except ACK frames.  Hence only packets that only contain ACK_FRAMEs do not generate acknowledgements.  

I'd rather no call out every frame that is expected to cause an ACK_FRAME to be sent, since it's all minus 1.

I need to clarify this and other text after discussion in Seattle, so I sent out PR #907

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/849#issuecomment-342690911

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status