Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] lost_pn can no longer be negative (#2621)

ianswett <> Tue, 16 April 2019 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BA1120A47 for <>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQaGREShQ2FP for <>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0038120A88 for <>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 07:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 07:08:26 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1555423706; bh=WPaGty72PFHvOoQo2JQF0cjwnYdUGkSHCR4Exw0piGo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=V7pzhnKRN/+MJHOqUYEn+IeUdUn3pCTUEtVun/qwQO3JxXRL6vDiv123eC7d6NvJw 6oDvFAN9OgqOKD1wnK+VFoVvt4yJNHetus0CgSmcvXaalq9BmscLCl7jYBkEsw2mSy PBuR/lfdMxatQ9AwCnuTXqOf8KT7X0nvZHJIRg0k=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2621/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] lost_pn can no longer be negative (#2621)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb5e1da9571a_1e683fcac94d45bc6023b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:43:01 -0000

Yes, the original issue was about underflow(ie: negative numbers), not overflow.  In practice, even a signed int64 is not going to overflow in any of this pseudocode, because packet numbers are 62 bits.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: