Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Boolean blocked streams setting (#3073)

Dmitri Tikhonov <> Tue, 08 October 2019 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBCC12004E for <>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92zZRUbZr6UC for <>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCCFD1200E0 for <>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 06:31:45 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1570541505; bh=2ebHJdKDY1XV9AKvO0cSj73DwIHhoWHsZZEQ8nQ0y0w=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=qoo6QGI+Tw3UK8/2jPemnkLrpnyjT9PYES/gBbWlcznY4WbqiyZDD02hdvZgHI8Jt xA8gQHVLIr72IX9P/Zsix7zhI0axCeTCypNgIvakYz5MSKyXmSvJr1mMNSrJ4Sj2BG ALcpjCCv9ylmu5xzwd88lpuQcHIQADhHUN5mHXNw=
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3073/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Boolean blocked streams setting (#3073)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d9c8fc1c0abd_75153fd09c2cd95c20948c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:32:05 -0000

@tatsuhiro-t writes:
> If there is no evidence that numerical limit (fraction of MAX_STREAMS) brings better performance, then boolean thing would be better.

Absence of evidence is not the same as evidence of absence.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: