[quicwg/base-drafts] Suggestion that Retry might not change CID (#2465)
Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Thu, 14 February 2019 21:10 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFB912F1AB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:10:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N2KusPc9rz3O for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:10:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-13.smtp.github.com (out-13.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C72E129532 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:10:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:10:12 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1550178612; bh=jUd5tlBRVZLkc8ETbxn9MeI0rHYOtr/TeDeigvRgmKk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=OmaQb/ASNLGZrOGy7E4OI+uaeo4lCyMEOAhhgI26nITbpG/FYgmiihJft51b2VUM9 pgbTF1tPkiKgeH/7zwAXUIK8kHPIGBFeNCgzwff/MTgdVmp5bAfCohXbv5x2RcMAne GhtHkgNpd/6m0nIJUoX59KlzBs5AvS7wF5NiJSu4=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abf11ff0c0552aea4f9726fdf32a719ef495eab37f92cf00000001187d9b3492a169ce1877a24b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2465@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggestion that Retry might not change CID (#2465)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c65d9349e6d1_48723fd988ad45c016406a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/py-_vBVeMcV8wfPYlmptK0gs6dc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:10:15 -0000
In 17.2.3, the transport draft says: > Receiving a Retry packet, especially a Retry that changes the connection ID used for subsequent packets, indicates a strong possibility that 0-RTT packets could be lost. However, in 17.2.5: > The server includes a connection ID of its choice in the Source Connection ID field. This value MUST not be equal to the Destination Connection ID field of the packet sent by the client. The subordinate clause in the first is unnecessary, as that statement is true of all Retry packets. In the second, should that be "MUST NOT" rather than "MUST not"? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2465
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggestion that Retry might … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggestion that Retry mi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggestion that Retry mi… Martin Thomson