Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how many connection IDs the peer is willing to store (#1994)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 26 November 2018 03:41 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C83130EF5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:41:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0cuxMsdJdRv3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B09130E8C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:41:07 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543203667; bh=7BlXNlnp004TXWW3rPijNQszBIXxW5XQCRh52oItSLM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=fi67F0Y3E/G748IQ5jqRjgaZaktlcoJy7xrFc4d5tjOcjwdFQdGfhX9+eha8Qxv3J kTu2+RaYqiDOtiKoxUeNiW0DJDTcePzbppXZu64zw9HoPoRI6HtuoUm6Yn1eqK055i qleHWPA+hAI0pUOVj1etOdx1DQi9qgVqIX6f3HR4=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abdd25e0f6c1f5540781f44fb74060acc7ddff44af92cf0000000118132d5392a169ce16a20dde@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1994/441510297@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1994@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1994@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how many connection IDs the peer is willing to store (#1994)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bfb6b533f6de_29153fcb81ad45bc2485db"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/pzqdrkq9ZjUlXBp_kFJGGUeFuEo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:41:09 -0000
As others have said, this makes things more deterministic, but more complex. I'm going to suggest that this is fertile ground for extensions. We can't know what the right answer is today, and it's going to take some deployment experience to get it right. More machinery will likely only interfere with our ability to deploy fixes if they are needed. And if no fixes are needed...success. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1994#issuecomment-441510297
- [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how man… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… Ryan Hamilton
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how… Martin Thomson