IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Certificate compression (#134)

Victor Vasiliev <notifications@github.com> Tue, 24 January 2017 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF71A129577 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 22:34:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.654
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fbPx7QUnOK8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 22:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59F4E129573 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 22:34:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=sCy3TsHf+gNF2eFYAHEPAz0rZUI=; b=CFz/INw/lEul1LLa c8HtbUjUa7JSjgNnJIbPTDdKkEg+nc4cq+4k8B6uu1iMdhQ1rCvb6n0W9e6UYcl0 it1Pm+stSIuoSNxB5CMBMlk4seN6qT0lKzWhIDeS8aZWamwbhXsc0vjtEpcOnSCP 85e3X4bnm7A+tXzkEHtbluuz5Ro=
Received: by filter0998p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0998p1mdw1-20162-5886F584-E 2017-01-24 06:34:44.2101979 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id WOmhZe9MTXaX6WRJM0BPeA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 06:34:44.367 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 22:34:44 -0800
From: Victor Vasiliev <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134/274721820@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Certificate compression (#134)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5886f58445fa1_6d863ff463669134172869"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: vasilvv
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1a0BR6847di0ixhoXAdpsRHVpEEthL60gX4s ZzLysJ2pLc1yU/NlpkXXTlox1CzGO6t+rq80i4uJof2Em22osCQTAc6DwipOvEjbHqc9D8hipcd7xg eHGGcpc7SoJaLjRHpwi1UAeC2A7uS8cpR6Sa65Gff43ZgvbxlxN4ERaMiB3UYaf8h9hyzdtT+WnMmb U=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/q4wU9i1I6duIl2Kczc3A7m1tGGU>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 06:34:46 -0000

I am still working on figuring out what would be the impact of compression with and without a pre-shared dictionary, as well as what dictionary we should use.  I expect to have some preliminary answers in a week or two.

With regards to the other ways of compression, I feel like both RFC 7924 and QUIC-style cached certificate chain should not matter in most cases since if we talked to a host before, what we really want is to just do a session resumption.  But I might be wrong, and I am not sure how a cert cache would behave in real-life situations when a lot of sites use it.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134#issuecomment-274721820

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status