[quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifiers not varints? (#2233)
ekr <notifications@github.com> Thu, 20 December 2018 23:13 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14836130F21 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:13:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGR8_UecLI24 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o10.sgmail.github.com (o10.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C8A130DF4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:13:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=L+l7OXhA/o8n+KEtYrXc+p4/LSM=; b=bPPvh98Z11ZIWIh2 XDNTMHsHImqOo1hB3LuiO9dnp5mcRr0ae/okqAlEdwfj9pOkHvS32Lk5WFYJNvBZ R4CfQ1uFZjzEHlloaGhF9perV0dUEHwvSTa58wUA9Noh69uV6B6JGbn3Gj521U+a NCyVL7TBIbZnKTHIo6vmn2IyN7g=
Received: by filter0571p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0571p1iad2-17016-5C1C221C-19 2018-12-20 23:13:32.313026855 +0000 UTC m=+98095.030771703
Received: from github-lowworker-4f62d42.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.35]) by ismtpd0014p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id y_-tXtqdSIKjOJoXRjjAJQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 23:13:32.349 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-4f62d42.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FC3C1966 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:13:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 23:13:32 +0000
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abaf07f511b8ea0936833fcd0ccde39f31e8d7c99692cf000000011833e41c92a169ce17707793@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2233@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifiers not varints? (#2233)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1c221c45e8b_4b113faa8b4d45c012961d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3R1rHU8ToKilgKW+2ETB4o9bOKED4UszFX6d JmqUwbYNH8p2BUVu3uccSXkDn/QzIsCvxeYdwOUYvvVDsNViFQXzSBasr8b1et7kfU3qlHBK/JikJe Clp5K0UJzaXo3t5ayH9gDqRZ3SaXAqkv6XILbc50yNlKqsRK8HSK7SeaFg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/qUiFxdOB5MqgMGthAGOMxlf4M7k>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 23:13:37 -0000
Currently we are using values which would be fit in one byte, so it would save a tiny bit of space, and given that you already have to parse the varint for the value anyway, it wouldn't make things harder, and would give flexibility for experimental extensions and the like. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2233
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifiers … ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifi… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifi… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifi… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifi… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifi… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifi… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifi… Mike Bishop