Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more specific when naming bits (#3089)

Robin Marx <notifications@github.com> Sun, 13 October 2019 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECEF120024 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FLR-25CjsCIN for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38C1120013 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-ca5950c.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-ca5950c.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.57]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E168D660C35 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1570994324; bh=/M8MZvqu5uLSfLFGhDbE1DS4RYuT4r73XewWmeLasP8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=e54SGp/LKI1T1LXJi7/ihXos50UiXoluey0IbzUR/WSaY5Z/sT74LHYWTJmwCNKGw THWgZjdzcdQJl2uaDStFRpIGFQTNvfJNeBikvDKuBRYEtrOrnEa+p983JLmmgtAs8m lbIDd5RMO2M44KlYwSnbMURw3dToLrPVkn7VFyWM=
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:18:44 -0700
From: Robin Marx <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6A5XRYLNAX3XPR2DV3WC4SJEVBNHHB4LNBAY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3089/review/301062301@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3089@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3089@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more specific when naming bits (#3089)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5da37894d30a8_daf3f92f6acd9601339a8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: rmarx
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/qcqwFW_LHwrR-h_WVzR3lOX810c>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:18:48 -0000

rmarx commented on this pull request.



> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ instructions received on the encoder stream.
 The decoder MUST emit header fields in the order their representations appear in
 the input header block.
 
-### Blocked Decoding
+### Blocked Decoding  {#blocked-decoding}

A) did not know about auto-anchoring
B) seems like it didn't work for this specific one, since draft-10 of the qpack document has an unresolved reference to the section (see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-qpack-10#section-2.1.3). Not sure why that's failing then...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3089#discussion_r334292071