Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe PMTU probing that includes source connection ID for routing … (#2402)

[Mike Bishop <[e-mail]>]

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.



> @@ -2670,9 +2670,10 @@ complete.  Though the values of some fields in the packet header might be
 redundant, no fields are omitted.  The receiver of coalesced QUIC packets MUST
 individually process each QUIC packet and separately acknowledge them, as if
 they were received as the payload of different UDP datagrams.  For example, if
-decryption fails (because the keys are not available or any other reason), the
-the receiver MAY either discard or buffer the packet for later processing and
-MUST attempt to process the remaining packets.
+decryption fails (because the keys are not available, the UDP datagram is a PMTU
+probe (see {{pmtu-probes-src-cid}}), or any other reason), the the receiver MAY

The idea behind your suggested change reads better, yes.  The specific suggested change has other issues that I assume are caused in part by other lines having changed:

> Receivers MUST be able to probe (...), or any other reason), the the receiver MAY process coalesced packets.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402#discussion_r257351086