Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] eliminate the difference between when having no RTT sample and having one (#3525)

Kazuho Oku <> Thu, 19 March 2020 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8523A1EE2 for <>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JdQ0o4r-7lw5 for <>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8648B3A1EE1 for <>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000FB8C116B for <>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1584577622; bh=UZ4h4G0U5bgKt0uy64oipXLEVz2ijX4CaVDqVpmrUzg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=c8F0hmpoODt91+REY6/P9us0fHEHQmCXJZ6ivOlzvG1UhvdNe3SrLx6hJS1oUAYRw 6oiD/TZiRXVvsbWh2gpkegMUYFLjDHhAYgQUGTDXCAEbMUUNoemmuhyBNLpywg80O4 0th6x3KD8GSccayctp3CLgWeaLxj2Egk9CDvphLk=
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:27:01 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3525/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] eliminate the difference between when having no RTT sample and having one (#3525)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e72bc55e41b9_42f43fe2c8acd95c105130"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:27:05 -0000

kazuho commented on this pull request.

> +smoothed_rtt and rttvar are computed as follows, similar to {{?RFC6298}}.  When
+there are no samples for a network path:

Splitting the text when having no samples and having one is intentional, see the changes suggested in

I'm personally fine with the changes proposed here, but I would like to see what @ianswett thinks. Maybe it's OK, as the we have two paragraphs right after, discussing about each of the two conditions.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: