Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not be ACK-eliciting (#2372)
Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 28 January 2019 04:56 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19FE130F9D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:56:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spuV1ap6lHhm for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:56:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 408AD130F8B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:56:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:56:10 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548651370; bh=9OhLqOWPlH1rPFN4vncPmNGMf6aCMdlzroWXBUMAhF8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SfE1bms33ysuDOvSe5mY2yeLz8k6RJz7Wrx2fINXlKnXdOQwvVCeKhXRdY0b551P1 XpTNufDyLhPPaLqiVjBY6fI746fGXyJoDSM2s0yIzAFsJ/nBmnsmVlZtdb4vzI05+4 imWQtajbtWnxZGdvnG28o0VrFfAvsR5fu6NtsAP4=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab4ce6c422c5271d04b3bcf17b6e2bfbe24cca9a7a92cf0000000118664d6a92a169ce180eb2c5@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2372/457999005@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2372@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2372@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not be ACK-eliciting (#2372)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c4e8b6a5fe09_1f23fc4de2d45b4463196"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/r7SqzOm1ls4h3O7VLJcyVg96_4U>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 04:56:13 -0000
I think the issue is if we want probing packet to not be ACK-eliciting. If the answer is yes, then we should consider what to do with other types of frames that are allowed to be included in a path probing packet: i.e., PATH_RESPONSE, NEW_CONNECTION_ID. I'd assume that we at least want NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame to be ACK-eliciting. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2372#issuecomment-457999005
- [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames are not ACK-el… Rui Paulo
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames are not AC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames are not AC… Rui Paulo
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames are not AC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames are not AC… Rui Paulo
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not… erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not… erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not… MikkelFJ