Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A day in the life (#3225)

ianswett <> Tue, 12 November 2019 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8676912022E for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:43:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7wylPKhuYWn for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE42212011D for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:43:56 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1573595036; bh=98dQCpS5yPLisFAAWRgy/FNTxozG0xBoNcDWkzxAiKM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=dy1RK64zYYUVFodiJWUUrCjASCWCO6QaObYrwfKU7Xf8pONoe9IX/JS7QE327MhSk KYYwf10OG2B7CNDf46emvvyhpu/m5YOoCD3P2FZHCeR77A1X74jvM2yD2hsUqxmecm l58elXmPElEIxjjbz7ywNQsHHMoLALICDSYR8DOU=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3225/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A day in the life (#3225)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dcb279ccf884_31ce3fda8c2cd96c1532760"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:43:59 -0000

ianswett approved this pull request.

> +handshake phase.  0-RTT allows application messages to be sent by a client
+before receiving any messages from the server.  However, 0-RTT lacks certain key
+security guarantees. In particular, there is no protection against replay
+attacks in 0-RTT; see {{QUIC-TLS}}.  Separately, a server can also send
+application data to a client before it receives the final cryptographic
+handshake messages that allow it to confirm the identity and liveness of the
+client.  These capabilities allow an application protocol to offer the option to
+trade some security guarantees for reduced latency.
+The use of connection IDs ({{connection-id}}) allows connections to migrate to a
+new network path, both as a direct choice of an endpoint and when forced by a
+change in a middlebox.  {{migration}} describes how a migration can be performed
+securely without adversely affecting privacy.
+For connections that are no longer needed or desired, there are several ways for
+a client and server to agree to remove connection state ({{termination}}).

I'm not sure this suggestion is better, but it reads a bit more easily to me.

a client and server to terminate a connection ({{termination}}).

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: