Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)

MikkelFJ <> Fri, 15 February 2019 07:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C7A130E7E for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:50:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8XXTwpIR_BGF for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E23B12D7EA for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:50:25 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1550217025; bh=k1tI0xk0hdl0ue1+QlKI5tQGKl2KLD2md+Wu8Az9s+g=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=dRylZ0e+ormn8FEWEMH6JK4y7s324HUYHhaL67ZyLej9ytl6auT6M7L/6eb4hXZDF 4oxyXu4WB3XkI9C4allmjJV2CCfJQvsZX/WPVfeAtFEd/+YfkjYs98OX95gsf/YIKt LxnMV/fDDu2dwyfpsve7tQtG+6lIi/PNnnLnb9QA=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2466/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c666f41d535b_45b23fab722d45bc102239e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 07:50:32 -0000

> Having permitted list of frame-types per each epoch is a sensible way of implementing a QUIC stack.

Agreed. The can check that list when implementing and there are no frames that suddenly sneak in unattended. When you add a frame you need to think about the context. For example, what does a KEYS_ACTIVE mean in 0-RTT?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: