Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are useful (#3572)

ianswett <> Thu, 23 April 2020 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF8E3A0A93 for <>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.482
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id INESlTIGV0tU for <>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F8713A0A90 for <>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DCB6E1F4C for <>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1587655821; bh=c09Hd1UPvGqtrRTUOAlszhudPkMjHO/1xGdefNxwkCM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=PRHNCJjZOsQOkyCL6xBYluhV3gkirYYXzOByQfQp6hN/+1sQfGtGgfK7eDL4iwnG2 /JhYYk3p8FyPSowmvrON/ySoRvwPiMWOPJbokmiKkzI0YEbX2nOqA9DyZ0/CgCAVBy Cr4YXqGCSy63LAGvYerIZhcWVvmjO29hBH8sglXs=
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:21 -0700
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3572/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are useful (#3572)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ea1b48d6703d_61a53fd2058cd9641359d3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:30:25 -0000

There's conversation on the issue( and Jana was concerned about adding another reference to RACK as well as recommending something that we don't have a detailed algorithm(and pseudocode) for.  In general, anything we have a SHOULD for has more text(and typically pseudocode) than this, so I accepted that point and adjusted the PR.  For example, the pseudocode doesn't detail how to detect spurious losses, since it's expected that could be fairly complex and implementation dependent.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: