Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] STOP_SENDING on Critical Stream (#2509)

Mike Bishop <> Fri, 03 May 2019 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4659120240 for <>; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lemR6Cg8_uFf for <>; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1CE61202E2 for <>; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 14:21:19 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1556918479; bh=j4aM0iLFZzG+8b2OPi3dVHbeqoXJd6qOSDF4w96vfNA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=zDg5TbXBJxYSuiEPSps+GS4Q7I5aZI/66K/GNCHjJWWZa7tHT4T0Nfx8fNYcIG1FR IK0O6EsmHVU9SW0cA1jhDbT/EEurk+cIuyTC6bfIwlb3pzBplgGDBjW1k5oXQMomz2 89fJLwDD/h9l+FkWZbJwX4iUxlXV/29d8Cw5TCg0=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2509/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] STOP_SENDING on Critical Stream (#2509)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cccb0cfa2be9_6a903fb862acd960121864"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 21:21:30 -0000

Re-reading this, I think the existing text is pretty good; it just needs a little reframing.  The existing requirement is to error out "If the control stream is closed at any point," without reference to whether it was closed because the peer send a FIN/RESET on their control stream or you obeyed a STOP_SENDING on yours.

I think I'll add an existing requirement not to request closure of a control stream; do you think we need more elucidation here?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: