IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Fri, 13 September 2019 05:49 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CB1120088 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ja9bbZ6L1-FD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8B34120086 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.102]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20951660167 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:49:17 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYVUYXU3KPJZGP4RTN3RBXG3EVBNHHB2ZES4M@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3028/531107331@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3028@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3028@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d7b2ddd1185f_d3f3fd9028cd960832b9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/sDeHXshhUhamk4F78-Mnj0WYzrw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 05:49:20 -0000

I believe a comment is needed in 5.4 to at least remind the reader that other ALPN's might receive the ticket and would not be able to make use of the settings data which therefore need coordination across token consumers.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3028#issuecomment-531107331

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email