Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred_address and NEW_CONNECTION_ID (#3560)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 01 April 2020 05:29 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F973A0C50 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pd25X33VDq7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4893A0C44 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:29:04 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1585718944; bh=FlLbuulGwpsF/MwtxF5KYIgKhC9uoWLx7warquvk4pw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0lHkrnD3bXn7slktwETvCMtG4Gl16VaVuzXr074rsqi7G1SZuPAQ01MrjnrcKgf4y prY/nNCdmurUomvp+KDBkLqySMG/5BQZ3oxT4R054nJGY5tJyZcQb91/0fOUGjMETE z6R63m+gFlBHsqLrpFo9a7xEEqrb+CV5wKoCLODE=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYF2LUTHTEEWAL7OVV4SAD2BEVBNHHCGNJIQI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3560/607040794@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3560@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3560@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred_address and NEW_CONNECTION_ID (#3560)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e8426a031569_562e3faf1b0cd9609215e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/sRfSDULvhZQp0Yzt6a0kEtO0264>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:29:27 -0000
That's an excellent point, and a good reason not to allow changing to zero-length connection IDs in combination with preferred_address. The nasty part of that is that in most cases that design would work because clients won't use the "new" connection ID until after the handshake is complete. Of course, it would fail spectacularly if a client did decide to switch earlier - and the client might attract the blame, where it is clearly the fault of the server. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3560#issuecomment-607040794
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred_add… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred… Martin Thomson