Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] IP Anycast with server IP+Port renegotiation (#560)

Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Mon, 14 August 2017 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CC2126BF0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bzyo40MzVe9v for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 682A9126B6E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=GzwWzwTyCkWwqP7rNv2mN9gM9wg=; b=JXP+bmD0uiaglQVQ ImrthrghEVcr0Nfuo1mQwgfDdxo2vEVDxp5VQog1CIVeYrBquHVT+OaCuKCKvh9i VRLwKT0BqYG/IBK2xYj4AvCVmLSJM+EqYMOl1Ye/XpVxmhj2G0oWVuMyFa19yPmS zhKoGIi5kFPP5Kql1zvY3fUHzgs=
Received: by filter0951p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0951p1mdw1-22831-5991382D-12 2017-08-14 05:42:05.184088866 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0026p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id f-C3ZM87Q8qrZcc8gSMD8A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 05:42:05.066 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 05:42:05 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abadb7e91f9a119de7b43005415b26d1fa81c5594392cf0000000115a8fa2c92a169ce0dd2a43a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/560/322104581@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/560@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/560@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] IP Anycast with server IP+Port renegotiation (#560)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5991382cd0aa4_b26e3fe2365b5c2c47819"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2KHADn/j3RDbm5hw68t0/f2Xu8wINP/F2HDi vmZ7CCbCPz639zOPlC42ys0R2mcaRfQdCZGJYVWqRX5wd4yJZI5mYloul590pJe0cDbwRM0uTk2rpx ruOii9mBu4j+jud/XDcGNxfIsp7okl7gJ7gxYdGvHSxKfSzkxyuiqfXR49+3hh0p/c0yfir3YM+DBa E=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/sXJV0xWySBwT0wcj-oOuWX6d9O0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 05:42:08 -0000

The anycast support is simpler than general server mobility.  Server only need to send the non-unicast address once. They could send the preferred IP address & port as part of the transport parameter TLS extension, probably together with a new connection ID.

I would also like to see a possibility to MIGRATE later in the connection, but that's a different issue.

I agree that this looks a bit like #161, but on the other hand, server initiated DOS is a much less acute problem that client initiated DOS. Currently, a server can easily send the client a script that will trick the client into bombing random locations -- I think the great cannon worked just like that. The general defense is to identify the server...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-322104581