Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document what needs to be checked for address validation (#2125)

Lucas Pardue <> Tue, 25 February 2020 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0813A07A1 for <>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KiMXpwkTlv1x for <>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 394EC3A07A0 for <>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57899280527 for <>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1582671545; bh=tsmFXfE+ui7BJNUfcUf5yo1AhGQw9Cl9bouBwUj10dA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=UdRaAnyRvcglHYQIPRRRx1KRzEjWr+24tFBacIpu1HDhFgc8goW98GYtfFrbhWvVG 6vfDwRj8hUR8KPUtcjRWepSeJ5a9x8kElbw3IfVYeVOfFOV5n8nAIIuHOSxzDnHTjx 7B6cl4F9JXMeFB7r1EFg82lS+oY7rJNyaB+upOsE=
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:05 -0800
From: Lucas Pardue <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2125/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document what needs to be checked for address validation (#2125)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e55a6b947e6d_36343f95ed8cd9681030f6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:59:08 -0000

Assuming comments been made on the PR since the discussion here seems dormant. Has that discussion settled or is it still in process? We can return to proposal-ready if you believe there is emerging consensus on the new remedy to this design issue.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: