Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document what needs to be checked for address validation (#2125)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Tue, 25 February 2020 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0813A07A1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KiMXpwkTlv1x for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-25.smtp.github.com (out-25.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 394EC3A07A0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-a6a2749.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-a6a2749.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.62]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57899280527 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1582671545; bh=tsmFXfE+ui7BJNUfcUf5yo1AhGQw9Cl9bouBwUj10dA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=UdRaAnyRvcglHYQIPRRRx1KRzEjWr+24tFBacIpu1HDhFgc8goW98GYtfFrbhWvVG 6vfDwRj8hUR8KPUtcjRWepSeJ5a9x8kElbw3IfVYeVOfFOV5n8nAIIuHOSxzDnHTjx 7B6cl4F9JXMeFB7r1EFg82lS+oY7rJNyaB+upOsE=
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:05 -0800
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3DB5AP63MOPWJRBNN4MLMTTEVBNHHBOQW33U@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2125/591118671@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2125@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2125@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document what needs to be checked for address validation (#2125)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e55a6b947e6d_36343f95ed8cd9681030f6"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/s_ztqS2D88bv63bQ-dbRLvKiORU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:59:08 -0000

Assuming comments been made on the PR since the discussion here seems dormant. Has that discussion settled or is it still in process? We can return to proposal-ready if you believe there is emerging consensus on the new remedy to this design issue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2125#issuecomment-591118671