Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Thu, 20 August 2020 08:29 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE7B3A09E1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 01:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wYq3BgPUSmjL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 01:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E68D3A09E0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 01:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-292e294.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-292e294.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.102.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30E25C0DDD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 01:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1597912189; bh=Zq0lwD73hKQYqlqFDB8wJ4CnwhzdR09WK4FT1BAA7ac=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=efLJQTX9hUulnvWwzpmtB2krqYCHeLDc3YJrv/fe9vwhjRv/026IhOPrKlP2OrHSS 7ow+TTKbn4is/ZuR/+GHcuEV5o8nWoqwWK6MuLhgjExbWbwu7gtTr6cYAUPpjLSHZf pTgEmLmR+D3MxU+ovjBo1rZa8eMe6ac7cQDArk7I=
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 01:29:49 -0700
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK47QZABVUREHGI6OFF5JIKX3EVBNHHCRJGS4U@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4022/677457383@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4022@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4022@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3e347d93c5f_30281964375332"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/swqooMtSo8KQcuKwPQZO5vJn-jA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:29:57 -0000
So would a resolution be "An end point can verify support for ECN by observing whether the ACK frames acknowledging the first packets it sends carry ECN counters"? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4022#issuecomment-677457383
- [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#402… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (… Lars Eggert