Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)

MikkelFJ <> Sun, 20 October 2019 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8551200DB for <>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 02:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QXh1h06r0zho for <>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 02:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946EE1200CC for <>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 02:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 02:58:00 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1571565480; bh=jxQXmW0dqFsbULFw/b+ekXG1ID30wYH6JHq83++vMIU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DRJB8I+Q6uzsSuG2LCqdQMzmMyOrGL1k0Erzm7omi7YXX+KViK0iqCJtXRFAkM1dt OPyeJJVzw1tQkPH1+BybXkPwl2DCwo7/gDnVpusQa5MGt+/10diL6woHSG+4l+RmAf TGLABfLXQM2uzoRGOkA2A2o0EaOSMhOGnHHL7cOA=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2143/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dac2fa83dc12_49a13faa798cd968339222"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:58:03 -0000

I think some of issues I was thinking about relate to a non-blind attack where packets are mirrored, but that might well be covered in your text. I'm just linking for reference

Another issue that has been discussed is in early handshake where a powerful (government) adversary can race packets during handshake through a faster network. This is also not blind, and it is not something QUIC v1 attempts to solve AFAIR.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: