IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does InPersistentCongestion calculate a bogus value? (#2694)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Mon, 13 May 2019 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E9912004F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 09:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aj9Wr8qsetTQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 09:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F0E120125 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 09:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 09:50:55 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1557766255; bh=io5dIZc8Nk/KQmHwVt7NghbxF+w/1NDJbv9qs8ZaLq0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xLOdWCiP3G4AvqC6UNS4/UsWapct8BX8ptdyciCcqAiXG/xX6AfQta9XXf5RLvdKG xGKKmRJjBPhfT+Hz1//KkXTQvTG4wQ+lauH007XqL0wjtJRfT4woBsQrogF8XW6kX0 FfYogV840naTQb8t0uMsU2IM1cPCTAIrfyG8Q14U=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK46F5MYRJWL76EDFJF243JO7EVBNHHBU3XTPQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2694/491901173@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2694@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2694@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does InPersistentCongestion calculate a bogus value? (#2694)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd9a06f60efe_3ace3fd4f6ecd9603065d6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/t4WaorohrrYL4WLONXM8q4K6-5s>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 16:50:58 -0000

I don't think it makes sense to state any particular resolution here. It ought to be clear that if your resolution does not cover your value range, you loose precision. The value range depends on circumstances.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2694#issuecomment-491901173

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email