[quicwg/base-drafts] Connection ID Sequence Number and Server's Preferred Address (#1483)
Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 26 June 2018 23:24 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D90E13113A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t_EiyoCIJRZP for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9B5131140 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:24:20 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1530055460; bh=ZGJ4GIMLf1JZ2X4WsZCG6txO4ANdKo5yMxeSnmiUbdw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=w1nCAXFjxD5DYySCvBw07guMcu9CCqeQw07jbhWqi+czadIKBPdY7bZ+h8Fx3okPu t1dOvdcylDKpy5sejsT/ECrtu6EkXffIHtNEBIHViBkUPP1xrOKmXieuoT7av9JcJG JUSswTpdHa6Js6JygdLt4J2zEix9UWpMF9l6uusw=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab0af51ac0623e86a7f1bc8542d3fa6b60064c420992cf00000001174a8d2492a169ce14075791@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1483@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection ID Sequence Number and Server's Preferred Address (#1483)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b32cb24c4dac_3b8c2b274d418f5811525"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/tD7qDGnnfirh5pkV8eDILTDVN-I>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:24:34 -0000
Follow-on issue from #1465. The existing text (restored but not changed by the PR) defines the CID selected during the handshake to be Sequence -1, and the CIDs issued via NCID frame to begin at zero. However, the CID issued by the server as part of the Server's Preferred Address doesn't have a suggested sequence number. If we follow a similar convention and assign it an implicit negative number (e.g. handshake becomes -2, SPA gets -1), that introduces another quirk: With the existing language, the server will answer with a new connection ID (say, 0) which will immediately force the client into a connection ID rotation anyway. Possible solutions include: - Not including a CID with the SPA parameter; client needs to wait for (and server needs to send) a NCID frame before the probe/transition has happened. - Server includes a sequence number in the SPA parameter and treats it like any other sequence number it has issued (but then why should the client be required to use that particular CID?) - SPA is implicitly sequence number zero, and server can use the client's sequence number zero in response -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1483
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection ID Sequence Numbe… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection ID Sequence N… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection ID Sequence N… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection ID Sequence N… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection ID Sequence N… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection ID Sequence N… Mike Bishop