Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are useful (#3572)
Matt Olson <notifications@github.com> Thu, 23 April 2020 17:33 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CE33A0D6C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22pT5ZpRqSdc for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-26.smtp.github.com (out-26.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65A383A09DF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-ca5950c.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-ca5950c.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.57]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6EC282C95 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1587663229; bh=exSM1ZAbDkncuJYuaiQUzm/czZN1X5aMyNkVXz5HYk8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mughYuJjrR4b9Q9TGO9ph2xar1d+cD2gnHX+XAMvgti3RltFrVcWD5BIXqvIrU9xg EOHUWLV8ldGRovwEL4re0koidkpkAgNeApxiJAPhXhOs/TIRz5QEnuqaHF/61nz6rS ACows/uTYKeiXeSzYDEln9SPw/zg6r+ZeWXexuU8=
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:33:49 -0700
From: Matt Olson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZNN6WOBWPXKGRIKTF4VWZH3EVBNHHCHD4D3E@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3572/c618537698@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3572@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3572@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are useful (#3572)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ea1d17d48203_f493f93f22cd95c10844ac"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: maolson-msft
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/tJ1x-JJQlwDNKiD1ZRn46L_gz3Y>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:33:53 -0000
Actually, I'm not so confident that RACK maps all that cleanly either, and Jana made the point that RACK's ReoWnd adjustment algorithm hasn't been closely examined, so I'm going to bow out here- I'm happy with either NCR or RACK. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3572#issuecomment-618537698
- [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive threshol… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SHOULD use adaptive thre… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Adaptive thresholds are … ianswett