Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] BLOCKED usage requirements (#65)

Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> Sun, 01 October 2017 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE62A134463 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crhdzgWU6x4w for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C49D134461 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=4SEhb222L4vNl93bG+1HAqXjuu8=; b=NCJs+Wu+3ZRNCsrA TWp1UR4OZT4Z1s6LQnRnYDexixQCaoSeze5AwzQVudsiVCdMmXYiLE8w4+TIhR5D ryxlZdojaaGK5WxFEwKIu50pZznX2tEzVx/8fQ9IL4syP7U3clqgLjyeIjXd3gKl 2XhXUjh1toZCB5VuuxM8XMJDfQk=
Received: by filter0975p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0975p1mdw1-12295-59D07D15-15 2017-10-01 05:28:53.373619564 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0008p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id pGS0FOCVQPmqKqCDzwmqEw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 05:28:53.187 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 05:28:53 +0000
From: Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abde217b0f729b640eacdfca24899d4c1cffc1933092cf0000000115e83f1592a169ce0b80e381@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/65/333354735@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/65@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/65@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] BLOCKED usage requirements (#65)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59d07d1540901_43b3fb2d834ef341282b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1HkaMgIyJzg/PCCSMNFcdYpUJdwmeW84pKVC bnSfkn4lu20lgBlRZYk3npB3adalobT5J33/KLD0E8TfpqXFYuGOn/cG1Ht0Jr+00RWzEfZYAKukN0 dnnZTPxBVbEmyYthMySYcOrUB7UwdEXixWnvivXVWKt7fEX7v03i7Rw7NgwpnTHGPg1rFLTiLBKxnK I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/tK4StRYFiie0XkadqVFjtkrEqfs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 05:28:55 -0000

I think the answer to MUST/SHOULD/MAY for the BLOCKED frame must be identical to the answer to whether this frame MUST/SHOULD/MAY be retransmitted in case of a loss.  See #452.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/65#issuecomment-333354735