Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout should have higher priority than time based loss detection (#2565)
Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Mon, 15 April 2019 03:18 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA58120334 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 20:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id stQEhGQpbo6h for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 20:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB381120047 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 20:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 20:18:20 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1555298300; bh=7Q0BrU6yCFj7Vsudv1r1VyKGMIDgzlrsF/bkRCzoHLQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=i4KnRS0ZHehAHNKSj8VO/m71w46CxlklZaQjDlxp7T6Jvs0HR++2GwyV6m+Ypme/8 F+rYlQLizFhx5MLGmIpsrkjpOi9gmvTa/7UqMCjzOGGLaMQ91fp2pc17wVK0jgyt10 tNkZ1DeGKuCvjWBIME/8qN7ruwyYsbofDhFb9Pcw=
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3eb3135303a2d714b5cd77262102e493f4349c4792cebac12a7c92a169ce19747553@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2565/483094193@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2565@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2565@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout should have higher priority than time based loss detection (#2565)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb3f7fced9c2_65983fd255ed45c47485db"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/taD-wUORHiVE_DIdQ-qFxESLLbE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 03:18:25 -0000
This was introduced as a fix to https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2435, and fixed in https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2451. I don't think that reverting that fix is a good idea. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2565#issuecomment-483094193
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout should h… Yang Chi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout shou… Yang Chi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout shou… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout shou… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout shou… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout shou… Yang Chi