Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Safety issue during incipient persistent congestion episode (#3259)

ianswett <> Tue, 04 February 2020 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C311200CD for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:31:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w174n0Z2WtFZ for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:31:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B306120105 for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:31:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57434C61FAC for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:31:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1580826676; bh=/NK6JfxWtmx4aT7fys/aGfbwXdZ4F2gtH1N9cd/S7vM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=s/vGu89WnkR+IV5cRJcj015vsyOpMzlR72CvBBPTaiIhVP5Tw2wUQeqwS9zS+UE3I BudBRxMlIFrErgL6N+XRwYcOwrGamXawB2irNopokxFrHADRZU0AlpJ+eJWVz+R12l KLT/S/GFD31JxlEHSRCQHN+lSmxkMV9wU0XTQBlU=
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 06:31:16 -0800
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3259/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Safety issue during incipient persistent congestion episode (#3259)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e39803451855_5d7c3fa6938cd95c98612"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 14:31:19 -0000

I do not want to change the existing algorithm, because the app-limited case is the case when the sender is strictly less aggressive than the congestion controller limits, so I believe it's less likely to cause issues for the network.

I can write text pointing out this difference.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: