Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] http3: Are reserved and non-core frames allowed before SETTINGS? (#2693)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Sun, 12 May 2019 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350771201C8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2019 15:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUH1gh8RHyxC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2019 15:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E7641200B1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 May 2019 15:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 15:32:10 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1557700330; bh=yzgHQPaUa1vgpGEEZ+xHETs7+8j5eqn+bShNwAWWu24=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nE/cG/MXA3ljrkcNsmD6EFQDiCH0+GSvhJVNDHXrpCeZtLgo4RBTGAqbR2tZuWAPb tyqLYRBplt2mBhgGtU8C9Wd03xAcajAtD/IFmcHtP0gkFqyH6V7vLomfa2juP6Oq4L Lah8/oUugCDR5jCF8CvKaVk9jJxaoWCT/J8cqpoc=
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2Q2ALQEKP4VFVCMMF24XIWVEVBNHHBU2NSLQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2693/491634881@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2693@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2693@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] http3: Are reserved and non-core frames allowed before SETTINGS? (#2693)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd89eeaa56c8_31a33fb8760cd96017148"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/tmFx2EsNfeXjNsm0KhR_JrZamN0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 22:32:14 -0000

Ooh yeah, that's a good catch too. 

We sort of have some text that captures this in section 4:

> Certain frames can only occur as the first frame of a particular stream type; these are indicated in Table 1 with a (1). Specific guidance is provided in the relevant section.

We could add tweaks or further guidance to this paragraph ( in a PR that also fixes #2692) that makes things explicitly clear .

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2693#issuecomment-491634881