Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC PTO is too conservative, causing a measurable regression in tail latency (#3526)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sun, 29 March 2020 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF7C3A07F9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 13:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_10_20=1.162, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l4TkfOsGTeet for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 13:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-28.smtp.github.com (out-28.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13C0E3A07FC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 13:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 13:39:43 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1585514383; bh=Ejq2/oxFDOZUs5uuxqlcne0KokiliE+4biRJdYEwDqE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=oo3vW9pYD3jKJ8UmKG4O705yvDmErcX6qmcyosC9C0x6qI13Sx2oKZGEMOYXD1pQh mp8w95nBVnfbzUrSNFgp84vPQbUzu4ihKJFOR24/LVEVZtFQ/S84jnsN3nBd2AU5rL iDnXKJIXzdlEYejSjcW7B8MRIGzVOcqvYWrO49HM=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5EG2I5CUY3SE4OH654RTUI7EVBNHHCFNKKLA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3526/605697733@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3526@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3526@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC PTO is too conservative, causing a measurable regression in tail latency (#3526)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e81078fdb848_4f583fca7f2cd95c337683"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ttXkU7na28kW0_Sh4W8ZqSYKHX8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 20:39:47 -0000

Instead of 1.5*SRTT we could consider SRTT + RTTVar.  I think that's slightly more principled, but should be similar to 1.5*SRTT for typical connections.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3526#issuecomment-605697733