Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packets (#1287)

Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com> Thu, 12 April 2018 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1125212D872 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFEiqj8H7IPh for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C34112D870 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=+7BhAZnrcLVPdsul4XHtruKOSwk=; b=Rmy9rdc9q8YBU5je LdqThout9GEmfjeDWTS5gO2WN67hbjswgav6yHtXs2jemiVEgNFnMXfsqo96p+Vy 2HbyDKxhiS7g4iELVaOkCxumwsCaHsYzfZrfag/jH9GPfiPzLkuyn8eK0pn4pxhV VBb4LMWMYNNfpp/yz69BKzH2vhY=
Received: by filter1203p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1203p1mdw1-10468-5ACEA95F-16 2018-04-12 00:33:35.843151224 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) by ismtpd0011p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id y9UO_IPbTkqDtdMi1iEi6Q for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:33:35.767 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:33:35 +0000
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abc8bb2e18c1779107fca073fcbbae1477195f725792cf0000000116e66b5f92a169ce12ae7fcb@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1287/380637430@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1287@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1287@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packets (#1287)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5acea95fb1493_43e42b22fdcdeed4735987"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1NKaAMvzIVAsagPox+xiT+crgx40lakDXywJ V8kcRJCQLA0rsozCdEkqkJeQnHkA4lT8c/rniSncMZpEaq5pyzXsCAU5wx48mQ1k5AFU7IiqnxaD8O cVFOpK+iJCqc8+wD91A4owc6zUQ9W6zCf9jJNRGisNiQCi1aoO+17JbXFkRPjZG/AOMlA5k4OF4/rg s=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/tuXDBHw_oXy9Q4asZhUs1RaTM70>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:33:38 -0000

I agree that the compound packets are pain, programming-wise.  Now one has to have "real packets" versus "QUIC packets" or do something else equally odd.

I'd go as far as to say that there can be at most one long-header packet in a compound packet.  (Is there a use case for having more than one?)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1287#issuecomment-380637430